ElaGames
slots

ElaGames was founded in 2021 and works out of a head office in Nicosia. That makes it one of the younger names in the slots supply chain, and the size of the catalogue reflects it.

We hold 68 games on our data source, of which 28 carry a dated release. The other 40 sit on the feed without a date attached, so the release history below describes the dated slice rather than everything the studio has shipped.

The oldest dated title on file lands on 2024-09-12, roughly three years after the studio was founded. That gap is a limit of our record, not evidence that nothing came before it, so treat the early catalogue as unmapped rather than empty.

On the dated games, the pace looks like this: 6 in 2024 (from that September start), 11 in 2025 and 11 in 2026, with the newest release on file dated 2026-08-20. Eleven a year is close to one release a month, which is a steady working rhythm for a studio this size rather than a flood.

The themes across the catalogue cluster tightly, and fruit leads:

• Fruit: 7 titles
• Fantasy: 4 titles
• Egyptian: 4 titles
• Animal: 3 titles
• Aquatic: 2 titles
• Halloween: 2 titles

Those tagged themes cover only part of the 68, so the list is a shape rather than a full map. What it does tell you is that ElaGames spends most of its time in the well-worn corners of the genre, fruit machines and Egypt above all, rather than chasing unusual settings.

Twelve ElaGames titles on our data source publish an RTP. Across those, the median is 95.35% and the average is 95.16%, against roughly 95.7% across the 80 studios we track.

That is a gap of around half a percentage point below the field. In long-run modelling terms it works out at roughly 50p more retained by the house for every £100 staked, and RTP is exactly that: a theoretical figure settled over millions of spins, not a forecast for your session.

The average sitting below the median is worth noticing. It means the low end of the range is dragging harder than the high end is lifting, so the weaker-paying titles are pulling the studio's headline number down.

The full spread runs from 94.03% to 97%, close to three percentage points from bottom to top. A spread that wide tells you the studio does not build to a single house maths standard, and it makes the individual title far more important than the studio average: picking the top of that range over the bottom is a bigger decision than picking ElaGames over another studio.

Volatility is rated on only 8 of the 68 titles, on a 1-to-5 ladder. The split is 4 Low, 1 Medium and 3 Very high, with nothing in between at Low to medium or High.

So the most common rating is Low, but the shape is a barbell rather than a house style. Half the rated games sit at the calm end and nearly as many sit at the far extreme, with a single title bridging the middle.

In practice those two ends feel like different studios. A Low-volatility slot pays smaller amounts more often, so the balance moves in small steps and a modest stake lasts a long time; a Very high one can run several hundred spins without a meaningful return before anything lands, and needs a bankroll and a temperament built for that.

The working advice for ElaGames is therefore to check the rating on the specific game rather than the studio. Two ElaGames titles opened side by side can behave nothing alike, and with only 8 of 68 rated, plenty of the catalogue arrives with no published signal at all.

One more thing worth knowing about RTP generally: the same slot is often supplied in more than one RTP configuration, and the casino chooses which one it runs. The figure we hold is what our data source lists, so check the game's own info or paytable screen in the client you are actually playing before you assume it matches.

Of the twelve titles that publish an RTP, one sits well clear of the rest. Rabbit Winpot Deluxe is listed at 97%, more than a full point above the next name down and comfortably above the field average, which makes it the outlier rather than the norm for this studio.

Behind it the numbers bunch up quickly. Scarab Wheel is listed at 95.8%, then a cluster of three at 95.5% (Aqua Mafia, Farm Hunt and Zeus Cashpot), Cash of Egypt at 95.4%, It's Shark Time Xmas at 95.3% and Mr. Pacho at 95%.

That band from 95% to 95.8% is where most of the published ElaGames maths lives, and it is a narrow one. It also explains the earlier gap between median and average: the visible titles cluster respectably, while the unlisted bottom of the range at 94.03% is what pulls the studio's average under the field.

The title names line up with the theme counts too. Scarab Wheel, Cash of Egypt and The Age of Cleopatra all sit in the Egyptian group, while Aqua Mafia and It's Shark Time Xmas cover the aquatic corner.

Our own reviewed slice is small and we will not dress it up. The desk currently tracks and links a single ElaGames release, The Age of Cleopatra (released 2026-07-30), against 68 games on file, so the reviews below are a current sample rather than a survey of the catalogue.

Set against the 80 studios we track, ElaGames lands like this:

• Catalogue size: 68 games, ranking 52 of the 80 studios we track, so firmly in the smaller half.
• RTP: an average of 95.16% against roughly 95.7% across the field, about half a percentage point under.
• Volatility: 21 of the 53 studios we hold ratings for lean Very high, so a high-variance house style is common; ElaGames' most common rating is Low, which is the less crowded position.

The honest read is a mixed one. The RTP is the weak column here, and half a point below the field is a real, if slow, cost over a long session, particularly on a studio whose published range bottoms out at 94.03%.

The volatility lean is where ElaGames looks different. Where most of the field piles into very high variance, four of the eight rated titles here sit at the calm end, which suits a player who wants a long, level session on a small stake more than one chasing a rare big hit.

Put together, the character is a small, fruit-led catalogue with steadier-than-average maths and a below-average return. That combination rewards picking by title, and it makes the published RTP on the individual game the number worth checking first.

A free demo is the sensible way to meet an ElaGames slot for the first time. It is the real game running on play money: the same reels, the same maths, the same features and the same paytable, so you can learn how a title actually works without a stake on it.

What a demo cannot show you is how the game behaves with your own money over a session. Play money removes the part that matters most, which is how you respond to a losing run, and it will not teach you staking discipline.

The volatility split here makes that limit sharper than usual. A short demo run of fifty or a hundred spins on one of the three Very high titles tells you almost nothing, because the dry spells those games are built around only appear over far longer stretches, while a Low-volatility ElaGames title will show you its rhythm quickly.

Free play is still the right first step, and it is free in every sense. Demos in Great Britain are 18+ and gated accordingly, so you will be asked to confirm your age before a game loads.

Modern slots are built mobile-first and scaled up to the desktop, rather than the other way round. In practice that means an ElaGames title should be designed around a portrait phone screen and thumb-reachable controls, with the larger layout as the secondary case.

The demos run in the browser. There is no app to install and nothing to download, so the same link works on a phone, a tablet or a laptop.

The UK rules apply on mobile exactly as they do on desktop, because they are tied to the British build of the game and not to the device you open it on. That means the 2.5-second minimum spin speed, no autoplay, and the online slots stake caps, whichever screen you are holding.

The statistics on this page describe the ElaGames catalogue as it appears on our data source, and each figure is computed only from the titles that actually publish it. That is why the sample sizes differ: 68 games on file, 28 with a dated release, 12 publishing an RTP and 8 carrying a volatility rating.

We quote those sample sizes deliberately. An average drawn from 12 of 68 titles is a signal about the studio, not a full accounting of it, and the unlisted games could shift any of these numbers.

The reviews are separate work. They come from the individual releases the desk sits down and plays, which today is a small current slice of the catalogue and is weighted towards recent titles.

We do not claim to have played all 68 games, and we will not imply otherwise. When the underlying data changes, whether a new release lands, a title publishes an RTP it previously withheld or a figure is corrected at source, we change the number here to match.