Red Rake Gaming
slots

Red Rake Gaming is a slots studio based in Valencia, Spain. It holds a UK Gambling Commission licence, which is the permission that lets its games run at GB-facing casinos. That is a statement about market access, not about how the games play.

We do not have a founding year on record, so there is no company history on this page. What we can describe is the catalogue as it sits on our data source.

That catalogue runs to 148 games, which ranks 34 of the 80 studios we track by size. It is a mid-table position and a useful one to picture: large enough that the name turns up regularly in a UK lobby, not so large that most of the output is archive you will never be served.

38 of those 148 titles carry a dated release on the feed. The oldest is 17 October 2024 and the newest sits at 13 August 2026, so the dated slice covers a little under two years rather than the studio's full working life.

Dated releases by year on our feed:

• 2024: 4 titles, from 17 October onwards
• 2025: 19 titles
• 2026: 15 titles, with the calendar running to 13 August

The shape there is a studio that stepped up in 2025 and has held roughly that rate into 2026. For a player, a steady release rate matters more than a headline catalogue number: it means new Red Rake titles keep landing in lobbies rather than the studio coasting on old ones.

The themes that repeat most across the catalogue:

• Fruit: 19 titles
• Egyptian: 10 titles
• Asian: 8 titles
• Halloween: 7 titles
• Horror: 7 titles
• Sevens: 6 titles

Fruit at 19 and Sevens at 6 point to a real classic-slot streak, and Egyptian is the usual studio staple. Halloween and Horror at 7 apiece is the entry that stands out: seven titles each is a recurring line, not a one-off seasonal novelty.

13 of the 148 titles on our data source publish an RTP. Across those 13 the median is 95.3% and the average is 95.42%. The studios we track average about 95.7%, so Red Rake sits below the field.

That gap is worth keeping in proportion. RTP is a long-run average measured over enormous numbers of spins, and a difference of a fraction of a percentage point will not decide any single session of yours in either direction.

What it does mean, over a long run of play at a fixed stake, is that slightly less of the money you put through comes back on average than at a typical studio we track. It is a reason to prefer a specific higher-RTP title if you have the choice, not a reason to avoid the studio.

The published range runs from 95.3% to 96.6%, but reading only the two ends gives the wrong impression. The median sitting exactly on the bottom of the range tells you most titles are parked at the floor: of the eight highest-RTP games on our data, five read 95.3% and only Vegas All In at 96.6% is genuinely clear of the pack.

So the honest expectation for a Red Rake title picked at random is around 95.3%, not the headline top figure. This is a narrow catalogue in RTP terms with one outlier on top, which means choosing on RTP here is about choosing the game rather than choosing the studio.

Volatility is thinner still. Only 2 of the 148 titles carry a rating on our data and both read Medium, which is far too small a sample to characterise a catalogue of this size. Treat it as two data points, not a house style.

For what those two are worth, a medium reading in practice sits between the extremes. You get fewer of the long dead stretches that a very high volatility game inflicts, and less of the small, steady grind of a low one, with wins arriving often enough to keep a session moving and top-end hits correspondingly smaller.

One thing to check for yourself at the casino: studios commonly ship a title in more than one RTP configuration and the operator chooses which one it runs. The figure in the game's own info panel at the site you are playing is the one that applies to your spins, whatever any statistics page says.

We only hold verified mechanic data for the individual releases our desk has played, which for Red Rake is a small slice of the catalogue. In that slice one mechanic appears: Hold and Win, in Mega Coins 2.

How a hold-and-win round typically behaves:

• Special symbols, usually coins carrying a cash value, land during the base game
• Enough of them at once triggers a respin round in which those symbols lock in place
• Each new special symbol that lands resets the respin counter, so the round continues while you keep hitting
• The round ends when the respins run out and you collect the total of the locked values, sometimes with a bonus for filling the grid

That structure moves where the money sits. A hold-and-win game usually pays less in ordinary spins and holds its value back for the respin round, so a session reads as quieter stretches punctuated by one meaningful feature.

Knowing that before you start is the difference between a base game that feels broken and one that is simply doing its job. If you dislike waiting for a single feature to carry a session, hold-and-win is the wrong shape for you regardless of who built it.

In Great Britain you cannot buy your way into that round. Feature buys are not permitted in the GB market, so UK builds ship without a buy button and the bonus has to be triggered in normal play, whatever you may have seen on a non-UK version of a game or on a stream.

The top of Red Rake's published RTP table is a cliff rather than a slope. Vegas All In at 96.6% sits clear at the top, then Million 777 Bells and Million Irish at 95.4%, and after that a flat block at 95.3% covering Christmas Wins, Cleo Team, Guardians of Luxor 3, Halloween Wins 2 and Hawaiitopia.

Read that as one title that is meaningfully better on paper and a catalogue that otherwise settles on a house number. If you want the best published return this studio has on our data, it is a single game rather than a shortlist.

The newest Red Rake titles our desk tracks and can link are Super 70 Stars, dated 30 July 2026, and Mega Coins 2, dated 16 July 2026, which publishes an RTP of 95.40% and runs a Hold and Win round.

That is 2 titles against a catalogue of 148, so treat our reviewed slice as a sample of what the studio is shipping right now, not a survey of everything it has made. The statistics above come from the full feed; the reviews come only from the games we have actually sat down with.

Against the 80 studios we track:

• Catalogue size: 148 games ranks 34 of 80, so mid-table by output
• RTP: an average of 95.42% against a field average of about 95.7%, which puts it below the middle
• Volatility: 21 of the 53 rated studios lean Very high, so a high-variance house style is common across the field, while both Red Rake titles rated on our data read Medium

The picture is a mid-sized studio with a conservative published RTP and, on the little evidence we hold, none of the very-high-variance appetite that much of the field has drifted towards.

That is not a weakness so much as a different character. If very high volatility games wear you out, a studio whose rated titles read Medium is worth a look, and the RTP gap is small enough that it should not be the deciding factor for a normal session. If you are chasing extreme swings, the field offers plenty of studios that lean that way harder.

A demo is the sensible way to meet a Red Rake game for the first time. It runs the actual game with the actual maths and the actual features on play money, so you can read the paytable, see how often anything happens and watch how a Hold and Win round resolves before your own money is involved.

What a demo cannot show you is how the game feels with your own balance on the line across a real session. Play-money spins do not create the pressure that makes people raise stakes after a quiet run, and with a medium lean on the titles we have rated those quiet runs are real even if they are shorter than on a very high volatility game. Demos in Great Britain sit behind an 18+ age gate, exactly like real-money play.

Slots released on this kind of timeline are built mobile-first and scaled up to desktop rather than the other way round. The demos run in a mobile browser with nothing to install, so a phone is a perfectly normal way to try a Red Rake title.

The UK rules travel with the build, not the device. The 2.5-second minimum spin time, the absence of autoplay and the stake caps apply on a phone exactly as they do on a desktop, because they are part of the UK version of the game.

The catalogue statistics on this page come from the studio's games on our data source, and each figure is computed only from the titles that actually publish it. That means 148 games for catalogue size, 38 for the release dates, 13 for the RTP figures and 2 for the volatility split.

Where a sample is that small we say so rather than presenting it as a catalogue verdict, and we do not carry a catalogue max win at all because the source for it is not reliable enough to publish.

The reviews are a separate thing. They come from the individual releases our desk plays, currently a small and recent slice of the 148, and we make no claim to have played everything Red Rake has made.

When the underlying data changes, the figures here change with it. A number on this page reflects what the feed and our own reviews say now, not what they said when the page was first written.